Online Personas: Who We Become When We Learn with Others Online

Margaret Lloyd, Carol Skyring, Daniel Fraser

Abstract


At the beginning of the millennium, Gladwell (2000) introduced the people who “do” the work within networks. These were dubbed connectors, mavens and salesmen. A decade on, Ochman (2013) intriguingly suggested that there were 181,000 social media gurus, ninjas, masters and mavens on Twitter. But who are these unexplained characters or personas? Have connectors, mavens and salesmen translated into contemporary social media and personal learning networks? This paper is therefore about the “who” rather than the “what” and “how” that are typically the focus of investigations into personal learning networks and social media interactions. This paper will contend that connectors, mavens and salesmen are still identifiable and active in network interactions, with the definition of the maven being concatenated into the role of mentor. The findings from an online survey also revealed another set of other discrete personas with characteristics created and affirmed by interactions with others. Interestingly, individuals can adopt different personas dependent on context. Thus “who” we are depends on “where” we are and “who” is with us. 


Keywords


personal learning network; connectors; mavens; salesmen; digital identity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). The basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.) Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Costa, C., & Torres, R. (2011, April). To be or not to be, the importance of digital identity in the networked society. Revista Educação, Formação & Tecnologias, n.º extra, 47‐53. Retrieved from http://eft.educom.pt/index.php/eft/article/view/216/126

Cover, R. (2012). Performing and undoing identity online: Social networking, identity theories and the incompatibility of online profiles and friendship regimes. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 18(2) 177-193. doi: 10.1177/1354856511433684

Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet and Higher Education, 15, 3–8.

Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Edelmann, N. (2013). Reviewing the definitions of “lurkers” and some implications for online research. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(9), 645-649.

Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.

Giraldi, N. A. (2016). The strength of weak social ties: Social activism and Facebook. Sociology & Criminal Justice Theses & Dissertations (Paper 3). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.odu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=sociology_criminaljustice_etds

Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference (1st ed.). Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

Gmidene, A., & Gharbi, J-E. (2015). The process of identity building in Second Life. Journal of Internet Social Networking & Virtual Communities, 2015, Article ID 828614. doi: 10.5171/2015.828614

Henderson, M. (2015). Using social media: Assumptions, challenges and risks. In M. Henderson & G. Romeo (Eds.), Teaching and digital technologies: Big issues and critical questions (pp. 115-126). Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.

Illich, I. D. (1971). Deschooling society. London: Calder and Boyars.

Johnston, J. (2012). Using identity as a tool for investigation: A methodological option in the researcher’s toolbox. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 5(5), 1-9.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

McCabe, K. A. (2003). A cognitive theory of reciprocal exchange. In E. Ostrom & J. Walker (Eds.), Trust and reciprocity: Interdisciplinary lessons for experimental research (pp. 147-169). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Murphy, J., Hill, C. A., & Dean, E. (2014). Social media, sociality and survey research. In C. A. Hill, E. Dean, & J. Murphy (Eds.), Social media, sociality and survey research (pp. 1-33). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Ochman, B. L. (2013, January 7). There are 181,000 social media gurus, ninjas, masters and mavens on Twitter. Advertising Age. Retrieved from http://adage.com/article/digitalnext/181-000-social-media-gurus-ninjas-masters-mavens-twitter/239026

Pelaprat, E., & Brown, B. (2012). Reciprocity: Understanding online social relations. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3324/3330

Secret teacher: I refuse to be a Kardashian with a PGCE. (2016, January 30). The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/2016/jan/30/secret-teacher-refuse-kardashian-with-a-pgce-social-media-toxic

Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm

Skyring, C. (2014). Learning in 140 characters: Microblogging for professional learning. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Australia. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/65854

Terry, D., & Hogg, M.A. (2012). Social identity processes in organizational contexts. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Welser, H. T., Gleave, E., Fisher, D., & Smith, M. (2007). Visualizing the signatures of social roles in online discussion groups. Journal of Social Structure, 8(2), 1-32.

White, N. (2001). Community member roles and types. Retrieved from http://www.fullcirc.com/community/memberroles.htm


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Based at Tarleton State University in Stephenville, Texas, USA, The Journal of Social Media in Society is sponsored by the Colleges of Liberal and Fine Arts, Education, Business Administration, and Graduate Studies.