Rumor Has It: Examining the Effects of Facebook Addiction on Political Knowledge Gullibility

Cynthia Nichols, Lori Melton McKinnon, Anna Geary


Political rumors, half-truths and unfortunate candid comments from candidates spread like wildfire across the social media spectrum, meaning social channels require constant care and maintenance. The purpose of this study is to examine how Facebook addiction can affect levels of gullibility to online political rumors. Prior to the 2012 elections, more than 500 respondents participated in a survey designed to measure gullibility to online political rumors. Respondents reported levels of addiction to Facebook and were asked to determine the validity of 20 statements regarding President Barack Obama and Republican candidate Mitt Romney. The statements varied in their level of accuracy, some obviously rumor, others seemingly true, but all originated from Internet sources and were disseminated by various Facebook users. In separate survey sections, political knowledge and the political activity of the users Facebook “friends” were measured. Results indicated that both Facebook addiction and gullibility decreased with age and the two variables have a strong correlation between them. 



social media; facebook; politics; gullabuility; facebook addiction scale

Full Text:



Andreassen, C. S., Torshiem, T., Brunborg, G. S., & Pallesen, S. (2012). Development of a Facebook addiction scale, Psychological Reports 11(2), 501-17.

Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant and D. Zillmann, Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, 121-154.

Bennett, W. L. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation." The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644, 20-39.

Bolt, A. (2010). Story shame for The Age. Herald Sun. Retrieved February 26, 2013, from

Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A., Marlow, C., Settle, J., & Fowler. J. (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489, 295-98.

Brandtzaeg, P. B., Luders, M., & Skjetne, J. H. (2010). Too many Facebook "friends"? Content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(11-12), 1006-030.

Buxmann, P., & Krasnova, H. (2013, January 21).Facebook makes users envious and dissatisfied. Retrieved from

Carpenter, J., Green, M., & LaFlam, J. (2011). People or profiles: individual differences in online social networking use. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 538-541.

DiGrazia, J., McKelvey, K., Bollen, J., & Rojas, F. (2013). More tweets, more votes: Social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior. PLoS ONE, 8(11): e79449. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.00794499

Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J., Horn, A., & Hughes, B. (2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 83-108.

Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-168.

Fitzgerald, B. (2012). Most popular sites 2012: Alexa ranks the 500 most-visited websites. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from

Franceschi-Bicchierai, L. (2012, November 03). How is facebook addiction affecting our minds?. Retrieved from

Garrett, R. K. (2011). Troubling consequences of online political rumoring. Human Communication Research, 37(2), 255-274.

Herther, N. K. (2011). All the news that's fit to post. Or is it? Searcher ,19(5), 20-28.

Holmes, J. (2010). Media watch: Accusations and reputations (02/08/2010). ABC Media Watch. Retrieved February 26, 2013, from

Jackson, B., Kiely, E., & Gore, D. (2012). Fact Check. . Retrieved from

Kerbel, M. R., & Bloom, J. D. (2005). Blog for America and civic involvement, The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(4), 3-27.

Loader, B., & Mercea, D. (2011). Networking democracy?. Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 757-769.

McClurg, S. D. (2006). The electoral relevance of political talk: Examining disagreement and expertise effects in social networks on political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 737-754.

Mikkleson, B., & Mikkleson, D. (2012). Mitt Romney: I can relate to black people. Snopes. Retrieved from

Morgan, M., Shanahan, J., & Signorielli, N. (2009). Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. In J. Bryant & M.B. Oliver (Eds.) Media effects: Advances in theory and research, 3rd ed. (pp. 34-49). New York: Routledge.

North, N. S. (2011). Social media’s role in branding: A study of social media use and the cultivation of brand affect, trust, and loyalty. Master’s Thesis: University of Texas, Austin, TX.

Ortutay, B. (2012). Facebook tops 1 billion users. Associated Press. Retrieved from

Price, T. (2012). Social media and politics. CQ Researcher, 22(36), 865-888.

Rainie, L., & Smith, A. (2012). Politics on social networking sites. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from

Rainie, L., Smith, A., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H., & Verba, S. (2012). Social media and political engagement. Retrieved from

Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., Davies, J., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2004). Implications of the mental models approach for cultivation theory. Communications, 29, 345-363.

Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. & Orr, R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 578-86.

Semiatin, R. (2012). Campaigns on the cutting edge. (2nd ed.). Washington DC: Sage.

Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media. Foreign Affairs, 90(1), 28-41.

Shrum, L. (1997). The role of source confusion in cultivation effects may depend on procession strategy: A comment on Mares (1996). Human Communication Research, 24, 349-358.

Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual and social identity. Communication Theory, 17(3), 281-303.

Smith, A. & Rainie, L. (2008). The Internet and the 2008 election. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from

Walton, A. G. (2012). Internet addiction shows up in the brain. Retrieved from

Walton, A. G. (2012). Internet addiction is the new mental disorder. Retrieved from

Williams, C. B. & Gulati, G.J. (2007). Social networks in political campaigns: Facebook and the 2006 midterm elections. American Political Science Association, 1-24.

Wood, S. (1990). Television's first political spot ad campaign: Eisenhower answers America. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 20(2), 265-283.

Woodard, E. H., & Gridina, N. (2000). Media in the home. Retrieved from

Xenos, M., & Moy, P. (2007). Direct and differential effects of the internet on political and civic engagement. Journal of communication, 57(4), 704-718.

Yuan, K., Qin, W., Wang, G., Zeng, F., Zhao, L., Yang, X., … Tian , J. (2011) Microstructure abnormalities in adolescents with Internet Addiction Disorder. PLoS ONE 6(6): e20708.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020708

Zhang, W., Johnson, T. J., Seltzer, T. & Bichard, S.L. (2010). The revolution will be networked: The influence of social networking sites on political attitudes and behavior. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 75-92.

Zhou, Y., Lin, F., Du, Y. S., Qin, L. D., Zhao, Z. M., Xu, J. R., & Lei, H. (2011). Gray matter abnormalities in Internet addiction: A voxel-based morphometry study. European Journal of Radiology,79(1), 92-95.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Based at Tarleton State University in Stephenville, Texas, USA, The Journal of Social Media in Society is sponsored by the Colleges of Liberal and Fine Arts, Education, Business, and Graduate Studies.