Why do health professionals create content on social media?
Uses and Gratifications of Egyptian “physician vloggers” on YouTube
Keywords:
social media, uses and gratifications, health communication, EgyptAbstract
Objective: While there are clear potential benefits for viewers of health videos, much less is known about why health professionals create content on platforms like YouTube. This article therefore explores the uses (or motivations) and rewards (or gratifications) these health professionals associate with using YouTube to publish video content, or vlogs, about health information. Method: We applied reflexive thematic analysis to data from in-depth interviews and focus groups with 12 popular Egyptian ‘physician vloggers’ (i.e., physicians, pharmacists, and psychologists with many YouTube subscribers). Informed by Uses and Gratifications Theory (UGT), we examined what motivated these health professionals to vlog on YouTube and the rewards, or gratifications, they received from doing so. Findings: Physician vloggers used YouTube to achieve self-focused goals, such as to develop their professional brands and save time in their offline work, as well as society-focused goals, such as to spread medical awareness for illness prevention, address cultural and social stigma around mental health, and offer free medical advice to those who need it. In return, vlogging on YouTube gratified participants with a sense of influence, recognition, and professional fulfilment, as well as with opportunities to build digital communication skills and deepen medical knowledge. Implications: Findings extend limited work on UGT to a context in which users create and share content, not just to consume it and, in doing so, furthers our understanding of what motivates health professionals to share content on YouTube. The results could be used to encourage medical professionals to pursue vlogging for health communication.
References
Abdel Wahed, W. Y., Hefzy, E. M., Ahmed, M. I., & Hamed, N. S. (2020). Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and perception of health care workers regarding COVID-19, a cross-sectional study from Egypt. Journal of Community Health, 45(6), 1242–1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-020-00882-0
Alanzi, T., & Al-Yami, S. (2019). Physicians’ attitude towards the use of social media for professional purposes in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications, 2019, Article 6323962. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6323962
Anderson, G. (1990). Fundamentals of educational research. The Falmer Press.
Bautista, J. R., & Lin, T. T. C. (2017). Nurses’ use of mobile instant messaging applications: A uses and gratifications perspective. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 23(5), e12577. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12577
Blumler, J. G., & Katz, E. (1974). The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (Vol. 3). Sage Publications, Inc.
Bracken, C., & Lombard, M. (2001). Uses and gratifications: A classic methodology revisited. New Jersey Journal of Communication, 9(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870109367401
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
Buf, D.-M., & Ștefăniță, O. (2020). Uses and gratifications of YouTube: A comparative analysis of users and content creators. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 22(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.21018/rjcpr.2020.2.301
Chan, L. S. (2020). Multiple uses and anti-purposefulness on Momo, a Chinese dating/social app. Information, Communication & Society, 23(10), 1515–1530. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1586977
Dizon, D. S., Graham, D., Thompson, M. A., Johnson, L. J., Johnston, C., Fisch, M. J., & Miller, R. (2012). Practical guidance: The use of social media in oncology practice. Journal of oncology practice, 8(5), 114–124.
Elkhayat, H., Amin, M. T., & Thabet, A. G. (2018). Patterns of use of social media in cardiothoracic surgery; surgeons’ prospective. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 26(3), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jescts.2018.07.003
Eppich, W. J., Gormley, G. J., & Teunissen, P. W. (2019). In-depth interviews. In: Nestel, D., Hui, J., Kunkler, K., Scerbo, M., Calhoun, A. (eds) Healthcare Simulation Research: A Practical Guide, 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26837-4_12
Essén, A., & Sauder, M. (2017). The evolution of weak standards: The case of the Swedish rheumatology quality registry. Sociology of Health and Illness, 39(4), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12507
Ghalavand, H., Panahi, S., & Sedghi, S. (2021). How social media facilitate health knowledge sharing among physicians. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(7), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1886326
Ghweeba, M., Lindenmeyer, A., Shishi, S., Abbas, M., Waheed, A., & Amer, S. (2017). What predicts online health information-seeking behavior among Egyptian adults? A cross-sectional study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(6), Article e216. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6855
Ghweeba, M., Lindenmeyer, A., Shishi, S., Waheed, A., Kofi, M., & Amer, S. (2022). The attitudes of Egyptian web-based health information seekers toward health information provided through the internet: Qualitative study. JMIR Formative Research, 6(2), Article e30108. https://doi.org/10.2196/30108
Giustini, D. M., Ali, S. M., Fraser, M., & Boulos, M. N. K. (2018). Effective uses of social media in public health and medicine: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v10i2.8270
Godskesen, T., Frygner Holm, S., Höglund, A. T., & Eriksson, S. (2021). YouTube as a source of information on clinical trials for paediatric cancer. Information, Communication & Society, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1974515
Gruzd, A., Haythornthwaite, C., Paulin, D., Gilbert, S., & Del Valle, M. E. (2018). Uses and gratifications factors for social media use in teaching: Instructors’ perspectives. New Media & Society, 20(2), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816662933
Hagg, E., Dahinten, V. S., & Currie, L. M. (2018). The emerging use of social media for health-related purposes in low and middle-income countries: A scoping review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 115, 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.04.010
Hague, P. N. (2022). Market research in practice: An introduction to gaining greater market insight (Fourth edition). KoganPage.
Harrison, D., Wilding, J., Bowman, A., Fuller, A., Nicholls, S. G., & Pound, C. M. (2016). Using YouTube to disseminate effective vaccination pain treatment for babies. PLOS ONE, 11(10), Article 0164123. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164123
Herzog, H. (1940). Professor quiz—A gratification study. In P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Radio and the printed page: An introduction to the study of radio and its role in the communication of ideas (pp. 64–93). Duell, Sloan & Pearce.
ICT Indicators Bulletin. (2020). Egyptian Ministry of Communication and Information Technology. https://mcit.gov.eg/en/Indicators
Jildeh, T. R., Abbas, M. J., Abbas, L., Washington, K. J., & Okoroha, K. R. (2021). YouTube is a poor-quality source for patient information on rehabilitation and return to sports after hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation, 3(4), e1055–e1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.03.01
Kamberelis, G., & Dimitriadis, G. (2005). Focus groups: Strategic articulations of pedagogy, politics, and inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed., pp. 887–907). Sage Publications Inc.
Kamel, M. M., Westenberg, J. N., Choi, F., Tabi, K., Badawy, A., Ramy, H., Elsawi, H., & Krausz, M. (2020). Electronic mental health as an option for Egyptian psychiatry: Cross-sectional study. JMIR Mental Health, 7(8), Artilce e19591. https://doi.org/10.2196/19591
Katz, E. (1959). Mass communications research and the study of popular culture: An editorial note on a possible future for this journal. Studies in Public Communication, 2, 1–6.
Katz, E., Haas, H., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). On the use of the mass media for important things. American Sociological Review, 38(2), 164–181.
Khan, M. I., Saleh, M. A., & Quazi, A. (2021). Social media adoption by health professionals: A TAM-based study. Informatics, 8(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8010006
Krueger, R. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
Mansour, E., Shehata, A., & Farrag, A. (2022). Egyptian physicians’ information-seeking behavior while serving in public isolation hospitals for coronavirus patients. Online Information Review, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-08-2020-0350
McGowan, B. S., Wasko, M., Vartabedian, B. S., Miller, R. S., Freiherr, D. D., & Abdolrasulnia, M. (2012). Understanding the factors that influence the adoption and meaningful use of social media by physicians to share medical information. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(5), Article e117. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2138
Mheidly, N., & Fares, J. (2020). Health communication research in the Arab world: A bibliometric analysis. Integrated Healthcare Journal, 2(1), Article e000011. https://doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2019-000011
Nguyen, B. M., Lu, E., Bhuyan, N., Lin, K., & Sevilla, M. (2020). Social media for doctors: Taking professional and patient engagement to the next level. Family Practice Management, 27(1), 19–14.
Pires, F., Masanet, M.-J., & Scolari, C. A. (2021). What are teens doing with YouTube? Practices, uses and metaphors of the most popular audio-visual platform. Information, Communication & Society, 24(9), 1175–1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1672766
Ratcliff, A. J., McCarty, J., & Ritter, M. (2017). Religion and new media: A uses and gratifications approach. Journal of Media and Religion, 16(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2017.1274589
Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
Suchman, E. (1942). An invitation to music. In P. F. Lazarsfeld & F. N. Stanton (Eds.), Radio research, 1941. Duell, Sloan & Pearce.
Taie, A., Metwally, T., Mahdy, S., & Abbas, H. (2022). Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Regarding COVID-19 among Physicians in Egypt. Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 25(1), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.21608/scumj.2022.215498
Tajeddini, K., Gamage, T. C., Hameed, W. U., Qumsieh-Mussalam, G., Chaijani, M. H., Rasoolimanesh, S. M., & Kallmuenzer, A. (2022). How self-gratification and social values shape revisit intention and customer loyalty of Airbnb customers. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 100, 103093.
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2021, September). Literacy rate, adult total (% of people ages 15 and above)—Egypt, Arab Rep. World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.ADT.LITR.ZS?locations=EG
Vaterlaus, J. M., & Winter, M. (2021). TikTok: An exploratory study of young adults’ uses and gratifications. The Social Science Journal, 1-20. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2021.1969882
Wang, T.-L. (2014). The usage behaviors, motivations and gratifications of using user-generated media: The case study of Taiwan’s Youtube. Advances in Journalism and Communication, 2(4), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajc.2014.24015
Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 362–369. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2013-0041
Wolfe, K. M., & Fiske, M. (1949). American mass media in action: The children talk about comics. In P. F. Lazarsfeld & F. N. Stanton (Eds.), Communications research, 1948-9 (1st ed., pp. 3–73). Harper & Brothers.
Younis, I., Abdel-Rahman, S. H., Salem, R. M., & Al-Awady, M. (2017). Use of online social media by female dermatology residents to communicate with their patients. Journal of the Egyptian Womenʼs Dermatologic Society, 14(2), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.EWX.0000513080.35449.76
Yücel, Y., & Çapraz, Y. C. (2022). An alternative for Turkish serials: Uses and gratifications of watching Indian soap operas by Turkish female viewers. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi/26306220, 40, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17829/turcom.931464
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).