The shifting foundations of current social media research and systems thinking as a remedy
Keywords:
Social Media, Systems ThinkingAbstract
The current state of social media research struggles to keep pace with a social media ecosystem that features quickly proliferating new platforms and the reinvention of existing platforms. In this perspective article, we encourage social media researchers to adopt systems thinking perspectives to cope with this reality. By thinking systemically, we hope that scholars of social media may be able to uncover complex phenomena that may help to address some of the wicked problems in social media research. We also hope that the field may benefit from scholars discussing the implications of their work in ways that relate to the systemic context of the social media platforms that they study.
References
Asare, J. G. (2020, April 14). Does TikTok Have A Race Problem? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/janicegassam/2020/04/14/does-tiktok-have-a-race-problem/
Boyd, D. (2015). Social media: A phenomenon to be analyzed. Social Media+ Society, 1(1), 2056305115580148.
Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2017). The affordances of social media platforms. The SAGE Handbook of Social Media, 233–253.
Carr, C. T., & Hayes, R. A. (2015). Social media: Defining, developing, and divining. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(1), 46–65.
Cohen, J., & Stewart, I. (2000). The collapse of chaos: Discovering simplicity in a complex world. Penguin UK.
Conger, K., Isaac, M., Mac, R., & Hsu, T. (2022, November 11). Two Weeks of Chaos: Inside Elon Musk’s Takeover of Twitter. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/11/technology/elon-musk-twitter-takeover.html
Cotter, K., Cho, J., & Rader, E. (2017). Explaining the News Feed Algorithm: An Analysis of the “News Feed FYI” Blog. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1553–1560. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053114
Dale, S. (2014). Content curation: The future of relevance. Business Information Review, 31(4), 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382114564267
de la Cruz Paragas, F., & Lin, T. T. (2016). Organizing and reframing technological determinism. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1528–1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814562156
Drack, M., & Schwarz, G. (2010). Recent developments in general system theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27(6), 601-610.
Duffy, C. (2022, December 8). The mass unbanning of suspended Twitter users is underway | CNN Business. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/08/tech/twitter-unbanned-users-returning/index.html
Duffy, C. (2022, December 12). Twitter relaunches option to pay for blue check marks | CNN Business. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/12/tech/twitter-verification-relaunch/index.html
Fong, J., Guo, T., & Rao, A. (2021). Debunking Misinformation in Advertising (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3875665). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3875665
Fung, B. (2023, April 5). Academic researchers blast Twitter’s data paywall as “outrageously expensive”. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/05/tech/academic-researchers-blast-twitter-paywall/index.html
Foote, J. (2022). A Systems Approach to Studying Online Communities. Media and Communication, 10(2), 29–40.
Gani, A. (2021, October 17). Facebook’s policing of vitriol is even more lackluster outside the US, critics say. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/oct/17/facebook-policing-vitriol-outside-us
Gold, A. (2021, November 9). Exclusive: New bipartisan bill aims to reduce sway of “opaque algorithms.” Axios. https://www.axios.com/algorithm-bill-house-bipartisan-5293581e-430f-4ea1-8477-bd9adb63519c.html
Ivanova, I. (2023, July 31). Twitter is now X. Here’s what that means. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/twitter-rebrand-x-name-change-elon-musk-what-it-means/
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
Karahanna, E., Sean Xin Xu, Yan Xu, & Zhang, N. (Andy). (2018). The Needs–Affordances–Features Perspective for the Use of Social Media. MIS Quarterly, 42(3), 737–756. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/11492
Klosowski, T. (2019, November 5). Opinion | Personalization Has Failed Us. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/05/opinion/personalization-privacy.html
Lai, C.‐H., & Lin, S. H. (2017). Systems theory. In C.R. Scott, J. R. Barker, T. Kuhn, J. Keyton, P. K.Turner, & L. K. Lewis (Eds.),The international ency‐clopedia of organizational communication(pp. 1–18). Wiley.
Ledwich, M., & Zaitsev, A. (2019). Algorithmic Extremism: Examining YouTube’s Rabbit Hole of Radicalization. ArXiv:1912.11211 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.11211
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 50.
Lerman, R., & Zakrzewski, C. (2022, November 17). Elon Musk’s first big Twitter product paused after fake accounts spread. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/11/11/twitter-fake-verified-accounts/
Lewis, R. (2020). “This Is What the News Won’t Show You”: YouTube Creators and the Reactionary Politics of Micro-celebrity. Television & New Media, 21(2), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419879919
Li, K. G., Mithas, S., Zhang, Z., & Tam, K. Y. (2019). Does Algorithmic Filtering Create a Filter Bubble? Evidence from Sina Weibo. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2019(1), 14168. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.14168abstract
Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green publishing.
Milmo, D., & Hawkins, A. (2023, July 29). ‘The everything app’: Why Elon Musk wants X to be a WeChat for the west. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/jul/29/elon-musk-wechat-twitter-rebranding-everything-app-for-west
Poole, M. S. (2014). Systems theory. In L. Putnam & D.Mumby (Eds.),The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods(pp. 49–74). SAGE.
Rathnayake, C., & Winter, J. S. (2018). Carrying forward the uses and grats 2.0 agenda: An affordance-driven measure of social media uses and gratifications. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 62(3), 371–389.
Reviglio, U., & Agosti, C. (2020). Thinking Outside the Black-Box: The Case for “Algorithmic Sovereignty” in Social Media. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 2056305120915613. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120915613
Ribeiro, M. H., Ottoni, R., West, R., Almeida, V. A. F., & Meira, W. (2020). Auditing radicalization pathways on YouTube. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372879
Sawyer, R. K. (2005).Social emergence: Societies as com‐plex systems. Cambridge University Press.
Stokel-Walker, C. (2020, January 7). YouTube’s Deradicalization Argument Is Really a Fight About Transparency. FFWD. https://ffwd.medium.com/youtubes-deradicalization-argument-is-really-a-fight-about-transparency-fe27af2f3963
Stroh, D. P. (2015). Systems Thinking For Social Change: A Practical Guide to Solving Complex Problems, Avoiding Unintended Consequences, and Achieving Lasting Results. Chelsea Green Publishing.
Sundar, S. S., & Limperos, A. M. (2013). Uses and grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(4), 504–525.
Thorson, K., & Wells, C. (2015). Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26(3), 309–328.
Wang, J., Zhu, Z., & Caverlee, J. (2020). User Recommendation in Content Curation Platforms. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 627–635. https://doi.org/10.1145/3336191.3371822
Yan, W., Sivakumar, G., & Xenos, M. A. (2018). It’s not cricket: Examining political discussion in nonpolitical online space. Information, Communication & Society, 21(11), 1571–1587. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1340499
Zhang, Y., Wells, C., Wang, S., & Rohe, K. (2018). Attention and amplification in the hybrid media system: The composition and activity of Donald Trump’s Twitter following during the 2016 presidential election. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3161–3182.
Zolkepli, I. A., & Kamarulzaman, Y. (2015). Social media adoption: The role of media needs and innovation characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.050
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
