Creating “Spaces” for Professional Development: Education Organizations’ Use of Facebook
Keywords:
Facebook, education, professional development, teachersAbstract
The affordances of the Web enable teacher collaboration and growth through learning communities within Web 2.0 environments (Greenhow, Robelia, & Hughes, 2009). Through a qualitative analysis of education organization profiles and postings on Facebook, we examined ways education organizations use social networking sites as a platform to promote trends and issues in education and to promote best practices. Data represents five education organizations and analysis shows the types and frequency of information posted for their followers on Facebook. Social media have the potential to impact professional development in many fields.
References
Christ, P. (2005). Internet technologies and trends transforming public relations. Journal of Website Promotion, 1(4), 3-14.
Davies, J., & Merchant, G. (2009). Web 2.0 for schools: Learning and social participation. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
Facebook (2015). About Facebook. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/facebook/info?tab=milestone
Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A Critique of Traditional Schooling. New York: Routledge.
Greenhow, C. Robelia, B., & Hughes, J.E. (2009). Research on learning and teaching with web 2.0: Bridging conversations. Educational Researcher, 38(4), 280-283.
The Hechinger Report (2012). Twitter and Facebook might soon replace traditional teacher professional development. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/03/twitter-and-facebook-migh_n_1737333.html
New Media Consortium. (2015). The NMC horizon report: 2015 higher education edition. http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2015-nmc-horizon-report-HE-EN.pdf
Pilgrim, J., & Bledsoe, C. (2011). Engaging preservice teachers in learning through social networking. The Journal of Literacy and Technology, 12(1), 2-25.
Richardson, W., & Mancabelli, R. (2011). Personal learning networks: Using the power of connections to transform education. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Rosen, D. & Nelson, C. (2008). Web 2.0: A new generation of learners and education. Computers in the schools, 25(3-4), 211-225.
The eBusiness MBA Guide (May 2016). Top 15 most popular social networking sites. Retrieved from http://www.ebizmba.com/articles/social-networking-websites
Waller, M. (2013). More than tweets: Developing the ‘new’ and ‘old’ through online social networking. In G. Merchant, J. Gillen, J. Marsh, J. Davies, Virtual Literacies: Interactive Spaces for Children and Young People (pp. 126-141). New York: Routledge.
Waters, R.D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A., & Lucas, J. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review,35. Elsevier. doi:10.1016
Willis, J.W., Stephens, E.C., Matthew, K.I. (1996). Technology, reading, and language arts. MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Zhang, J. (2009). Toward a creative social we for learners and teachers. Educational Researcher, 38(4), 274-279.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).