Self-Presentation Techniques Used by Local Television Sports Broadcasters on Twitter
Keywords:
broadcasting, self-presentation, parasocial, Twitter, sports, mediaAbstract
Using self-presentation theory as a guide, this study examined if local sports broadcasters in the United States were more likely to write about their work life (front stage) or their personal life (backstage) when on Twitter. A content analysis of 19,649 tweets from 201 sportscasters throughout the United States revealed that the majority of tweets (77.4%) demonstrated front stage personas (a work-related tool), with the remaining 22.6% categorized as backstage personas (giving details about their personal lives). This illustrates that sportscasters’ interactions with followers online are, in essence, not much different from their interactions with them on television, in that they are simply giving them scores and news. Additional analysis addressed the difference in tweet content based on gender and what size city the broadcaster worked in. Theoretical implications regarding self-presentation theory and practical implications for sports media members are discussed.
References
Babbie, E. (2013). The practice of social research (13th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Baiocchi-Wagner, E. A., & Behm-Morawitz, E. (2010). Audience perceptions of female sports reporters: A social-identity approach. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3(3), 261-274.
Barthel, M., & Shearer, E. (2015, August 19). How do Americans use Twitter for news? Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/08/19/how-do-americans-use-twitter-for-news/
Boyle, R., & Haynes, R. (2013). Sports journalism and social media: A new conversation. In B. Hutchins & D. Rowe (Eds.), Digital media sport: Technology and power in the network society. New York: Routledge.
Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., & Gummadi, P. K. (2010). Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. ICWSM, 10, 10-17.
Doyle, A. (2013, January 21). It’s time for sports broadcasting to stop relegating women to sideline eye candy. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/annedoyle/2013/01/21/its-time-for-sports-broadcasting-to-stop-relegating-women-to-sideline-eye-candy/
Duffy, T. (2016, April 19). Twitter is abusive and declining, but still dominates the sports media. Retrieved from http://thebiglead.com/2016/04/19/twitter-is-abusive-and-declining-but-still-dominates-the-sports-media/
Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56(293), 52-64.
Ellis, E. I. (1992). Opportunities in broadcasting careers. Lincolnwood, IL: VGM Career Horizons.
Emmons, B., & Butler, S. (2013). Institutional constraints and changing routines: Sports journalists tweet the Daytona 500. Journal of Sports Media, 8(1), 163-187.
Frederick, E. L., Lim, C. H., Clavio, G., & Walsh, P. (2012). Why we follow: An examination of parasocial interaction and fan motivations for following athlete archetypes on Twitter. International Journal of Sport Communication, 5(4), 481-502.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.
Gregory, S. (2009, June 5). Twitter craze is rapidly changing the face of sports. Sports Illustrated. Retrieved from http://www.si.com/more-sports/2009/06/05/twitter-sports
Hambrick, M. E., Simmons, J. M., Greenhalgh, G. P., & Greenwell, T. C. (2010). Understanding professional athletes' use of Twitter: A content analysis of athlete tweets. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3(4), 454-471.
Hardin, M., & Shain, S. (2005). Strength in numbers? The experiences and attitudes of women in sports media careers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(4), 804-819.
Hester, J. B., & Dougall, E. (2007). The efficiency of constructed week sampling for content analysis of online news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(4), 811-824.
Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215-229.
Houlberg, R. (1984). Local television news audience and the para‐social interaction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 28(4), 423-429.
Hull, K. (2014). A hole in one (hundred and forty characters): A case study involving PGA Tour golfers’ Twitter usage during The Masters. International Journal of Sports Communication, 7(2), 245-260.
Kaid, L., & Wadsworth, A. J. (1989). Content analysis. In P. Emmert & L. L. Barker (Eds.), Measurement of communication behavior (pp. 197-217). New York: Longman.
Lebel, K., & Danylchuk, K. (2012). How tweet it is: A gendered analysis of professional tennis players' self-presentation on Twitter. International Journal Of Sport Communication, 5(4), 461-480.
Levy, M. R. (1979). Watching TV news as para‐social interaction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 23(1), 69-80.
Marwick, A., & boyd, d. (2011). To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence, 17(2), 139-158.
Master, S. (2016). “Year in Sports Media Report: 2016.” Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/reports-downloads/2016-reports/nielsen-year-in-sports-report-feb-2016.pdf
Palmgreen, P., Wenner, L. A., & Rayburn, J. D. (1980). Relations Between Gratifications Sought and Obtained A Study of Television News. Communication Research, 7(2), 161-192.
Papper, B. (2008). Record numbers for women and minorities. Retrieved from http://www.bobpapper.com/attachments/File/RTDNA_reports/wm2008.pdf
Pearlman, J. (2014, July 14). Women in sports media: Intelligence and talent lose out-yet again. Retrieved from http://www.jeffpearlman.com/women-in-sports-media-intelligence-and-talent-lose-out-yet-again/
Pegoraro, A. (2010). Look who's talking–Athletes on Twitter: A case study. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3(4), 501-514.
Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. (2005). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research (2nd ed). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Rubin, A. M., Perse, E.M., & Powell, R. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12, 155-180.
Rudd, M. (2012, March 1). Twitter and sports broadcasting: A brave new world. Retrieved from http://www.sportsnetworker.com/2012/03/01/twitter-and-sports-broadcasting-a-brave-new-world/
Sagan, P., & Leighton, T. (2010). The Internet & the future of news. Daedalus, 139(2), 119-125.
Sanderson, J. (2011). It’s a whole new ballgame: How social media is changing sports. New York: Hampton Press.
Schultz, B., & Sheffer, M. L. (2010). An exploratory study of how Twitter is affecting sports journalism. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3(2), 226-239.
Sheffer, M. L., & Schultz, B. (2010). Paradigm shift or passing fad? Twitter and sports journalism. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3(4), 472-484.
Weathers, M., Sanderson, J., Matthey, P., Grevious, A., Warren, S., & Tehan, M. (2014). The tweet life of Erin and Kirk: A gendered analysis of professional sports broadcasters' self-presentation on Twitter. Journal of Sports Media, 9(2), 1-24.
Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2006). Mass media research: an introduction, (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Wolfley, B. (2013, April 8). ESPN’s Adam Schefter, Marquette University’s Axthelm speaker talks about his career. Retrieved from http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/202006421.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).