Using Microblogging as a Social Media Tool for Discussions in Higher Education Classrooms
Keywords:
social media, higher education, microbloggingAbstract
Through this qualitative study, researchers explored how preservice teachers’ roles and functions vary when participating in both instructor-directed and student-directed microblogging discussions about children’s literature on the microblogging platform, Todays Meet. Preservice teachers from three universities participated in an instructor-directed within university microblogging (WUM) discussion as well as a student-led across university microblogging (AUM) discussion with preservice teachers from the other two universities. The researchers developed a three-pronged framework based on the work of Java et al. (2007), Ebner and Maurer (2008), and Gao et al. (2012) to analyze the microblogging interactions in the WUM and AUM groups. Findings revealed that the AUM discussions tended to have more depth and moved away from the provided questions. Additionally, the participants demonstrated all the functions and roles of the microblogging framework in the AUM opposed to the WUM where several were absent. In this study, microblogging provided an opportunity for an interactive experience and the social construction of knowledge among preservice teachers.
References
Buyea, R. (2010). Because of Mr. Terupt. New York, NY: Yearling.
Croxall, B. (2010, June 7). Reflections on teaching with social media [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/reflections-on-teaching-with-social-media/24556
Draper, S.M. (2012). Out of my mind. New York, NY: Atheneum Books.
Ebner, M., Lienhardt, C., Rohs, M., & Meyer, I. (2010). Microblogs in higher education – A chance to facilitate information and process-oriented learning? Computers & Education, 55, 92-100.
Ebner, M., & Maurer, H. (2009). Can weblogs and microblogs change traditional scientific writing? Future Internet, 1, 47-58.
Grisham, D., & Wolsey, T. (2006). Recentering the middle school classroom as a vibrant learning community: Students, literacy and technology intersect. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49, 648-660.
Gao, F., Luo, T., & Zhang, K. (2012). Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008-2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 783-801.
Goldenberg, C. (1991). Instructional conversations and their classroom application. National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007). Why we Twitter: Understanding micro-blogging usage and communities. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA workshop on web mining and social network analysis.
Jonassen, D.H., Howland, J., Moore, J., & Marra, R.M. (2003). Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mills, K. A., & Chandra, V. (2011). Microblogging as a literacy practice for educational communities. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 55, 35-45.
Murphy, P. K., Wilkinson, I. A. G., Soter, A. O., Hennessey, M. N., & Alexander, J. F. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ high-level comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 740-764.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Palacio, R. J. (2012). Wonder. New York, NY: Knopf Books.
Perry, B., (2008, January 23). Twitter for academia [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://academhack.outsidethetext.com/home/2008/twitter-for-academia/
Prestridge, S. (2014). A focus on students’ use of Twitter – Their interactions with each other, content and interface. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15, 101-115.
Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323, 122-124.
Veletsianos, G., Kimmons, R., & French, K. (2013) Instructor experiences with a social networking site in a higher education setting: Expectations, frustrations, appropriations, and compartmentalization. Education Technology Research and Development, 61, 255–278.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Woodson, J. (2014). Brown girl dreaming. New York, NY: Penguin Group.
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
