#TrumpStyle: The Political Frames and Twitter Attacks of Donald Trump
Keywords:
Twitter, Framing, Political Frames, Donald TrumpAbstract
On January 20th, 2017, Donald J. Trump was inaugurated as the 45thPresident of the United States. No recent U.S. President has consistently engaged the U.S. media in such an adversarial way. Donald Trump’s personality, combined with the still emerging social media platform of Twitter, has thrown a rhetorical Molotov cocktail into the house of the body politic.This exploration of Trump’s Twitter rhetoric in regards to the U.S. media is important in three regards: (1) Twitter is now officially ensconced as a legitimate and effective political tool. (2) Twitter is now the primary avenue for dissemination of political propaganda and “talking points” and (3) When weaponized, Twitter can completely fracture the public and tangibly alter the reality/perceptions of a non-discerning public, to the point of embracing the most outlandish conspiracy theories or political narratives. In addressing these issues and contributing to current scholarship, this paper will utilize framing theory to engage in a content analysis of Trump’s “Fake News” tweets. In doing so, we should gain a better understanding of how Donald Trump uses 180 characters to develop allies, engage his opposition, promote his agenda, respond to criticism and define himself.
References
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.).
New York: McGraw-Hill.
Glaser, A. (2018, January 19). Twitter admits there were 50,000 Russian bots trying to confuse American voters before the election. Slate. Retrieved from http:// www.slate.com
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An easy on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Iyengar, S. (1991). Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kosicki, G.M. (1993). Problems and opportunities in Agenda-setting research. Journal of Communication. 43 (2): 100–27. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01265.x.
Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. White River, VT: Chelsea Green
Price, V., Tewksburg, D. and Powers, E. (1997): Switching trains of thought: the impact of news frames on cognitive responses, Communication Research, 24 (5), 481–506
The Trump Twitter Archive. http://www.trumptwitterarchive.com/
Tversky, A. &; Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211 (4481): 453–58.
Vatz, R. (2009). The mythical status of situational rhetoric. The Review of Communication, 9 (1), 1-5.
Volz, D. & Ingram, D. (2018, January 25). Facebook: Russian agents created 129 U.S. election events. Reuters News. http://www.reuters.com
Weaver, D. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication. 57(142). doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00333.x.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
