I just look it up: Undergraduate student perception of social media use in their academic success
Keywords:
college, university, social media, academic success, technology, student learning, traditionally-aged studentsAbstract
College students are increasingly using social media. This case study explores how traditionally aged college students perceive social media use contributes to their academic success. We used survey data collected at a college student union to understand the social media students use in their academic pursuits and to inform a focus group discussion. Findings indicate that students do not differentiate between technology and social media, and that they rely heavily on social media to facilitate their academic success. This case study indicates that while using social media extensively may create minor issues for students, proper use can support academic endeavors.
References
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five traditions (2nd Ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ericson, B. (2011). The relationship between student use of socially interactive technology and engagement and involvement in the undergraduate experience. Dissertation, Boston College.
Etaugh, C., & Spiller, B. (1989). Attitudes toward women: Comparison of traditional-aged and older college students. Journal of College Student Development, 30(1), 41-46.
Gable, G. (1994). Integrating case study and survey research methods: an example in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 3(2), 112-126.
Gray, K. Annabell, L. & Kennedy, G. (2010). Medical students use of facebook to support learning: Insights from four case studies. Medical teacher, 32(12), 971-976.
Hanson, K. (2011). Blog enabled peer-to-peer learning. Journal of Dental Hygiene, 85(1), 6-12.
Hanson, T., Drumheller, K., Mallard, J., McKee, C. & Schlegel, P. (2011). Cell phones, text messaging, and facebook: Competing time demands of today’s college students. College teaching, 59, 23-30.
Heiberger, G. (2007). “Have You Facebooked Astin Lately?” Master’s thesis, South Dakota State University.
Henry, S. (2012). On social connection in university life. About Campus, 16(6), 18-24.
Jacobsen, W., & Forste, R. (2011). The wired generation: Academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students. Cyber Psychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 14(5), 275-280.
Junco, R. (2012a). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & Education, 58(1), 162-171.
Junco, R. (2012b). Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 187-198.
Kirschner, P., & Karpinksi, A. (2010). Facebook and academic performance. Computers in human behavior, 26, 1237-1245.
Kitzinger, J. (1995). Introducing focus groups. Qualitative research. 311, 299-302.
Lin, W. & Yang, S.C. (2011). Exploring students’ perceptions of integrating Wiki technology and peer feedback into English writing courses. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(2), 88-103.
Miller, M., & Mei-Yan, L. (2012). Serving non-traditional students in e-learning environments: Building successful communities in the virtual campus. Educational Media International, 40(1-2), 163-169.
Merriam, S. (1998). Research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nian-Shing, C., Hsiu-Chia, K., Kinshu & Taiyu, L. (2006). A model for synchronous learning using the internet. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(2), 181-194.
Olofsson, A., Lindberg, J. & Hauge, T. (2011). Blogs and the design of reflective peer-to-peer technology-enhanced learning and formative assessment. Campus Wide Information Systems, 28(3), 183-194.
Ophir, E., Nass, C. & Wagner A. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583-15587.
Phillips, D. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5-12.
Rideout, V., Foehr, J., & Roberts, D. (2010). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18-year-olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from: http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/8010.pdf.
Scott, P., Castaneda, L., Quick, K. & Linney, J. (2009). Synchronous symmetrical support: a naturalistic study of live online peer-to-peer learning via software videoconferencing. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(2), 119-134.
Stage, F. & Manning, K. (2003). What is your research approach? In Stage, F. K., & Manning, K. (Eds.). Research in the college context: Approaches and methods (pp. 19‐34). New York, NY: Brunner‐Routledge.
Stake, R. (2005). Qualitative case studies. Strategies of qualitative inquiry, 4, 119 – 149.
White, B., Becker-Blease, K., & Grace-Bishop, K. (2010). Stimulant medication use, misuse, and abuse in an undergraduate and graduate student sample. Journal of American College Health, 54(5), 261-268. doi: 10.3200/JACH.54.5.261-268
Wodzicki, K., Schwammlein, E., & Maskaliuk, J. (2012). "Actually, I wanted to learn": study-related knowledge exchange on social networking sites. Internet & Higher Education, 15(1), 9-14.
Wolf, K. (2010). Bridging the distance: the use of blogs as reflective learning tools for placement students. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(5), 589-602.
Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: design and methods. California: Sage Publications.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).