Policy insight through social and online media
A systematic mapping of qualitative passive citizensourcing studies
Keywords:Systematic mapping, Qualitative research, Online comments, Citizensourcing, Public policy, Social media
This systematic mapping study examines how and why researchers conduct qualitative studies of online citizen commentary on public policy matters, and identifies procedural commonalities and differences. Findings indicate that researchers typically: choose online comments to help understand public discussion and salient attitudes to important policy matters; believe online citizen commentary can give insights into community attitudes because it is unsolicited and relatively anonymous and unconstrained; believe anonymity is the main disadvantage because it can be difficult to ascertain who is commenting or which groups are represented; justify their choice of source data sites by preferring those with ready access to a large readership or large numbers of comments; manually ‘copy and paste’ online comments from one or more sites, mostly news media websites; use thematic analysis to identify emergent attitudes and influences; and either omit discussion of ethical issues or assert that because the data is freely accessible to the public, it is open to use without ethics permission. Recommendations include: more specificity in research areas and questions; greater use of multiple and diverse source types; less use of frequency and description in analysis and more use of theory and complex analysis; and integration of ethical considerations into research design.
Androutsopoulou, A., Charalabidis, Y., & Loukis, E. (2018). Policy Informatics in the Social Media Era: Analyzing Opinions for Policy Making, Cham.
Bossetta, M. (2018). The Digital Architectures of Social Media: Comparing Political Campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S. Election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 471-496. doi:10.1177/1077699018763307
Burnap, P., Rana, O. F., Avis, N., Williams, M., Housley, W., Edwards, A., . . . Sloan, L. (2015). Detecting tension in online communities with computational Twitter analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 95, 96-108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.04.013
Charalabidis, Y., Loukis, E., Androutsopoulou, A., Karkaletsis, V., & Triantafillou, A. (2014). Passive crowdsourcing in government using social media. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(2), 283-308. doi:doi:10.1108/TG-09-2013-0035
Cooper, I. D. (2016). What is a "mapping study?". Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 104(1), 76-78. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.104.1.013
Franco, M., Tursunbayeva, A., & Pagliari, C. (2016). Social media for e-Government in the public health sector: protocol for a systematic review. JMIR research protocols, 5(1), e42.
Ghermandi, A., & Sinclair, M. (2019). Passive crowdsourcing of social media in environmental research: A systematic map. Global Environmental Change, 55, 36-47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.02.003
Grover, P., Kar, A. K., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Janssen, M. (2019). Polarization and acculturation in US Election 2016 outcomes – Can twitter analytics predict changes in voting preferences. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 438-460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.009
Guajardo Leal, B. E., Navarro-Corona, C., & Valenzuela González, J. R. (2019). Systematic Mapping Study of Academic Engagement in MOOC. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.4018
Head, B. W. (2013). Evidence-Based Policymaking – Speaking Truth to Power? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 72(4), 397-403. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12037
Jalali, S., & Wohlin, C. (2012). Systematic literature studies: database searches vs. backward snowballing. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement, Lund, Sweden.
Jaspal, R., Nerlich, B., & Koteyko, N. (2012). Contesting Science by Appealing to Its Norms: Readers Discuss Climate Science in the Daily Mail. Science Communication, 35(3), 383-410. doi:10.1177/1075547012459274
Kaplan, S., & Prato, C. G. (2016). “Them or Us”: Perceptions, cognitions, emotions, and overt behavior associated with cyclists and motorists sharing the road. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10(3), 193-200. doi:10.1080/15568318.2014.885621
Keelan, J., Pavri, V., Balakrishnan, R., & Wilson, K. (2010). An analysis of the Human Papilloma Virus vaccine debate on MySpace blogs. Vaccine, 28(6), 1535-1540. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.11.060
Kozinets, R. V. (2019). Netnography: The Essential Guide to Qualitative Social Media Research: SAGE Publications.
Mandelzis, L., Bernstein, A., & Ringel, S. (2017). Critical reading of talkbacks discourse as separatist integration: on the Israeli 2004 Football Cup victory. Israel Affairs, 23(5), 934-950. doi:10.1080/13537121.2017.1345418
Marino, V., & Presti, L. L. (2018). From citizens to partners: the role of social media content in fostering citizen engagement. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy.
McKenna, B., Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2017). Social media in qualitative research: Challenges and recommendations. Information and Organization, 27(2), 87-99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2017.03.001
Mehmet, M. I., D'Alessandro, S., Pawsey, N., & Nayeem, T. (2018). The national, regional and city divide: Social media analysis of stakeholders views regarding biological controls. The public reaction to the carp control herpes virus in Australia. Journal of Environmental Management, 227, 181-188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.093
Natow, R. S. (2019). Online Qualitative Data Sources for Federal Regulatory Policy Studies. American Behavioral Scientist, 63(3), 315-332. doi:10.1177/0002764218820567
O'Cathain, A., Thomas, K. J., Drabble, S. J., Rudolph, A., & Hewison, J. (2013). What can qualitative research do for randomised controlled trials? A systematic mapping review. BMJ Open, 3(6), e002889. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002889
Panagiotopoulos, P., Bowen, F., & Brooker, P. (2017). The value of social media data: Integrating crowd capabilities in evidence-based policy. Government Information Quarterly, 34(4), 601-612. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.009
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, 2(1–2), 1-135.
Petersen, K., Vakkalanka, S., & Kuzniarz, L. (2015). Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update. Information and Software Technology, 64, 1-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007
Saldana, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers: SAGE Publications.
Simmons, P., & Mehmet, M. I. (2018). Shark management strategy policy considerations: Community preferences, reasoning and speculations. Marine Policy, 96, 111-119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.08.010
Taeihagh, A. (2017). Crowdsourcing: a new tool for policy-making? Policy Sciences, 50(4), 629-647. doi:10.1007/s11077-017-9303-3
Templier, M., & Paré, G. (2018). Transparency in literature reviews: an assessment of reporting practices across review types and genres in top IS journals. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(5), 503-550. doi:10.1080/0960085X.2017.1398880
Tengku Izhar, T. A. (2018). A Framework-based Mapping and Filtering for Social Media. 2018, 7(1), 18. Retrieved from https://www.thejsms.org/index.php/TSMRI/article/view/175/178
Tursunbayeva, A., Franco, M., & Pagliari, C. (2017). Use of social media for e-Government in the public health sector: A systematic review of published studies. Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 270-282.
Walker, M., King, G. A., & Hartman, L. R. (2018). Exploring the Potential of Social Media Platforms as Data Collection Methods for Accessing and Understanding Experiences of Youth with Disabilities: A Narrative Review. 2018, 7(2), 26. Retrieved from https://www.thejsms.org/index.php/TSMRI/article/view/393
Waterloo, S. F., Baumgartner, S. E., Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2017). Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp. New Media & Society, 20(5), 1813-1831. doi:10.1177/1461444817707349
White, P. (2017). Developing Research Questions: Palgrave.
Wongkoblap, A., Vadillo, M. A., & Curcin, V. (2017). Researching mental health disorders in the era of social media: systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research, 19(6), e228.
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).